The Single Judge Bench of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act Tribunal allowed the respondent liberty to file written submission despite closure of reply filing date.
Liberty granted to respondent to file written submission in lieu of reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016
Ziqitza Health Care Ltd.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Anirudh Sharma, Advocate Shri Abhaid Parikh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 11.05.2018
FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016
In the above said matter on 11th October, 2017; the right to file the reply was closed. Still the reply has been filed by the respondent. Counsel for the appellant has raised the objection. It is true that on the last date it was not informed by either side in this regard. The learned counsel for the respondent is now agreeable for the same who seeks liberty to file the written submission instead of relying upon the reply. The appellant has no objection.
List on 27th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 11th May, 2018 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the right to file reply in money laundering proceedings was closed and the admissibility of late filed reply.
Ziqitza Health Care Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
