FPA-PMLA-1310/DLI/2016 of Krishanayan v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP7 Nov 2019FPA-PMLA-1310/DLI/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order from the Appellate Tribunal for Special Offences listed a file regarding multiple appeals filed under the PMLA Act. The court directed the respondent to file the prosecution complaint to verify if the appellants' properties are involved. The matter was listed for further hearing on 16 January 2020, with an interim stay maintained.

What did the court decide?

Listed for hearing on 16 January 2020; interim stay continues; respondent to file prosecution complaint.

FPA-PMLA-1310/DLI/2016 of Krishanayan v/s The Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) MP-PMLA-2550/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016
Sanjeev Tyagi	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent
(2) MP-PMLA-2563/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1310/DLI/2016
Krishanayan	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent
(3) MP-PMLA-2613/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1316/DLI/2016
Sangeeta Tyagi	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent
(4) MP-PMLA-2565/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1211/DLI/2016
Neel Krish	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director,	…	Respondent
Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellant	:	Shri Manav Gupta, Advocate Shri Devesh Dutta, Advocate Shri Devang Kumar, Advocate Ms. Mansi Khanna, Advocate
For the respondent	:	Ms. Aishani Narain, proxy counsel for Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate

¶5

FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016, FPA-PMLA-1310, 1316 & 1311/DLI/2016

¶6

Page 1 of 2

¶7

CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶8

ORDER 07.11.2019

¶9

FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016, FPA-PMLA-1310, 1316 & 1311/DLI/2016

¶10

The learned counsel for the appellant is present and he is insisting on hearing on the appeal are particularly with respect to the properties owned by Krishanayan & Sangeeta Tyagi who are neither accused nor accused in the prosecution complaint. He could not be able to verify whether the properties owned by these two appellants are also property in prosecution complaint. Let the respondent file the copy of prosecution complaint to ascertain that these properties are part of properties involved in the trial before the learned Special Court.

¶11

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that he will file the undertaking that the properties in question shall not be disposed of or deal with in any manner directly or indirectly. Let the same be filed.

¶12

List the matter on 16^th January, 2020.

¶13

Interim order to continue.

¶14

(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶15

New Delhi, 7^th November, 2019

¶16

‘D’

¶17

FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016, FPA-PMLA-1310, 1316 & 1311/DLI/2016

¶18

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1310/DLI/2016 of Krishanayan v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1310/DLI/2016 of Krishanayan v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases