Remanded

FPA-PMLA-1255/BNG/2016 of Shri Mallasiddappa S Patil v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

ATFP2 Dec 2019FPA-PMLA-1255/BNG/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

List of four miscellaneous petitions filed by appellants against the Assistant Director/ED, Bangalore. The court allowed parties to file written synopses and listed matters for further instructions. No substantive legal issue decided.

What did the court decide?

None granted; parties permitted to file written synopses; matters listed for hearing on 27.04.2020.

FPA-PMLA-1255/BNG/2016 of Shri Mallasiddappa S Patil v/s The… — Company and Corporate | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP-PMLA-5251/BNG/2019 (Preponment) MP-PMLA-4676/BNG/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1254/BNG/2016
Smt. Bharati Alias Bhowramma …	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore …	Respondent
2. MP-PMLA-5252/BNG/2019 (Preponment) MP-PMLA-4677/BNG/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1255/BNG/2016
Shri Mallasiddappa S Patil …	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore …	Respondent
3. MP-PMLA-5253/BNG/2019 (Preponment) MP-PMLA-4678/BNG/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1256/BNG/2016
Shri Vinod S. Patil …	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore …	Respondent
&
4. MP-PMLA-5254/BNG/2019 (Preponment) MP-PMLA-4679/BNG/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1257/BNG/2016
Shri Shankara Gouda A. Patil …	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore …	Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the Appellants : Mr. Chidananda URS BG, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate FPA-PMLA-1254-1257/BNG/2016 Page 1 of 2

¶5

Page 1 of 2

¶6

CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA

¶7

: ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶8

ORDER 02.12.2019

¶9

FPA-PMLA-1254-1257/BNG/2016

¶10

Learned counsels for both the parties are present.

¶11

Pleadings are complete.

¶12

Parties are allowed to file written synopsis by the next date.

¶13

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the rent received by the appellants from out of the property at Serial no.1, 4 & 6, which are rented, to deposit with the respondent/ED. Learned counsel for the appellants has agreed that the rents are being paid through cheques to the ED but he is not sure about the recent payments, if any, and he will take instructions on the said fact. The learned counsel for the respondent is also seeking time to take instructions regarding the payments of the rent by the appellants with the respondent/ED at Bangalore.

¶14

In the circumstances, list the matters on 27^th April, 2020.

¶15

(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶16

New Delhi, 02^nd December, 2019

¶17

‘AS’

¶18

FPA-PMLA-1254-1257/BNG/2016

¶19

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1255/BNG/2016 of Shri Mallasiddappa S Patil v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1255/BNG/2016 of Shri Mallasiddappa S Patil v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases