FPA-PMLA-1169/DLI/2015 of Prem Nath v/s The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1169/DLI/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Prem Nath V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. FPA-PMLA-1324/DLI/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Pankaj Premnath | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-1087/DLI/2015 | ||
| Pankaj Prem Nath | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-1169/DLI/2015 | ||
| Prem Nath | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| & | ||
| 4. FPA-PMLA-1170/DLI/2015 | ||
| Sheila Premnath | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … | Respondent |
¶3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
¶4
| For the Appellants | : | Ms. Harshitha Reddy, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Aditya Wadhwa, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G. C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| FPA-PMLA-1324/DLI/2016, FPA-PMLA-1087, 1169 & 1170/DLI/2015 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Dr. Pankaj Premnath
- appellant
Pankaj Prem Nath
- appellant
Prem Nath
- appellant
Sheila Premnath
- respondent
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · January
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1169/DLI/2015
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court