FPA-PMLA-1169/DLI/2015 of Prem Nath v/s The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1169/DLI/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Prem Nath V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| **1. ** | FPA-PMLA-1324/DLI/2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Pankaj Premnath | … Appellant/Applicant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
|
| **2. ** | FPA-PMLA-1087/DLI/2015 | |
| Pankaj Prem Nath | … Appellant/Applicant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
|
| **3. ** | FPA-PMLA-1169/DLI/2015 | |
| Prem Nath | … Appellant/Applicant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
|
| **4. ** | FPA-PMLA-1170/DLI/2015 | |
| Sheila Premnath | … Appellant/Applicant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
|
| Advo | cates/Authorized Representatives | who appeared |
| For t | he appellant : |
Shri Debopriyo Moulik, Advocate Mr. Aditya Wadhwa, Advocate |
| For t | he respondent : |
Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| COR | AM | |
| JUST | ICE MANMOHAN SINGH : |
CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI | G.C. MISHRA : |
MEMBER |
¶3
FPA-PMLA-1324/DLI/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1087,1169 & 1170/DLI/2015
¶4
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Dr. Pankaj Premnath
- respondent
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
- appellant
Pankaj Prem Nath
- appellant
Prem Nath
- appellant
Sheila Premnath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · August
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1169/DLI/2015
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court