The Appeal Tribunal reserved orders on two money laundering appeals and fresh applications. It granted the parties one week to file written synopses. No substantive decision was recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-4952/AHD/2018 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-821/AHD/2015 Ahmed Mohamed Hasanfatta
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
&
2. MP-PMLA-4955/AHD/2018 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-1048/AHD/2015 Ahmed Mohamed Hasanfatta
… Appellant
Versus
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Chetan K. Pandya, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
21.05.2019
FPA-PMLA-821/AHD/2015 & FPA-PMLA-1048/AHD/2015
Orders reserved in the appeals as well as in the fresh applications filed
by the appellants as learned counsels for both parties have made their submissions.
Both the parties are granted one week time to file the written synopsis.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 21st May, 2019 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-821/AHD/2015 & FPA-PMLA-1048/AHD/2015
Page 1 of 1
Ahmed Mohamed Hasanfatta
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
