Single-member order adjourning the matter due to the respondent's illness, directing verification of compliance with predeposit conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-3/MUM/1998
Shri Ahmed Suleman Hajiji … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
ORDER
21.02.2019
FPA-FE-3/MUM/1998
The learned counsel for the respondent sought adjournment as he was not well. He was directed to verify whether all the condition of predeposit by the appellant as per the Tribunal’s order dated 12th October, 2009 were complied with in the prescribed time provided and he may apprise the Bench on the next date of hearing. The counsel for the appellant has no objection.
List on 4th July, 2019.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 21st February, 2019 ‘D’
FPA-FE-3/MUM/1998
Page 1 of 1
Shri Ahmed Suleman Hajiji
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
