Appellant did not appear. Registry found that cited letter regarding recall of impugned order had not been received by respondent. Registry directed to share copy. Appellant appointed. Matter listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-FE-406/CHN/2019 (Review) RP-FE-07/CHN/2017 (RP) FPA-FE-30/CHN/2009
Shri K. Zakir Hussain … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
ORDER 03.07.2019
MP-FE-406/CHN/2019 (Review), RP-FE-07/CHN/2017 (RP) & FPAFE-30/CHN/2009
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. A letter has been received in the registry dated 25.06.2019 wherein the counsel Shri V.S. Thiageswaran has stated that “absence of counsel due to justifiable reasons cannot be the sole ground for dismissal of a case. It is once again prayed that justice may be rendered by recalling the order dated 14.12.2018.” The learned counsel for the respondent states that he has not received this letter. The registry is directed to give him a copy of the same.
List for hearing on 14th October, 2019.
(Ananya Ray)
Member
New Delhi, 3rd July, 2019 „D‟
FPA-FE-30/CHN/2009
Page 1 of 1
K. ZAKIR HUSSAIN
SPECIAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, CHENNAI
ANANYA RAY
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
