Thin order recording adjournment of the appeal to allow the respondent to file a written synopsis. The matter was listed for future hearing on 17th February, 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-179/MUM/2001
Shri Darshan Hasmukh Shah … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Rohit Singh, Proxy counsel On behalf of Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Agam Kaur, Legal Consultant CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN ORDER 03.10.2019
FPA-FE-179/MUM/2001
Mr. Rohit Singh, intern appeared on behalf of Shri Chandra Shekhar Suman, main counsel for the appellant. Ms. Aagam Kaur, legal consultant appears for the respondent. She is requesting two week’s time to file the written synopsis, which is not objected from the other side.
List on 17th February, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 03rd October, 2019 ‘AS’
FPA-FE-179/MUM/2001
Page 1 of 1
Shri Chandra Shekhar Suman
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
