The appellate tribunal allowed two weeks for written synopses in matters FPA-FE-16/MUM/2011 and FPA-FE-17/MUM/2011 before reserving orders. No legal proposition is decided in this brief entry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-FE-16/MUM/2011 Shri Adnan Sami Khan … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Manik Dogra, Advocate Ms. Charul Sarin, Advocate Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant 2. FPA-FE-17/MUM/2011 Smt. Sabah Sami Khan … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Advocate |
|---|---|
| Ms. Mugdha Pande, Advocate | |
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 22.08.2019
FPA-FE-16/MUM/2011 & FPA-FE-17/MUM/2011
All the parties have concluded their arguments. They need two
week’s time to file the written synopsis. Let the same be done within two weeks.
Orders reserved in both the matters.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi,
22nd August, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-FE-16/MUM/2011 & FPA-FE-17/MUM/2011
Page 1 of 1
Shri Adnan Sami Khan
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Smt. Sabah Sami Khan
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
