Single Member bench of the Appellate Tribunal for SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT Act disposed of multiple revision petitions by staying disposal, directing listing after the outcome of a related Supreme Court case on maintainability.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-FE-198/DLI/2005
Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Appellant Versus Sh. Rajinder Singh & Ors. … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Mr. Prashant Pandey, L.C. |
|---|---|---|
| For respondent no. 1 | : | None |
| For respondent no. 7 | : | Mr. Vaibhav Bhadana, Advocate |
| For respondent no. 6 | : | Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocate |
2 . FPA-FE-158/MUM/2008 Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Appellant Versus Sh. Mukund Patel & Ors. … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Prashant Pandey, L.C. For respondent no. 1 : Mr. Sarthak Sachdev, Adv. Mr Wattan Sharma, Adv. 3 . FPA-FE-142/CHN/2010 Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Appellant Versus Sh. Ravichandran & Ors. … Respondent
FPA-FE-198/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-158/MUM/2008, FPA-FE-142/CHN/2010, FPA-FE-538/CHN/2003, FPAFE-1053/CHN/2004, FPA-FE-719/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-154/JL/2008 & FPA-FE-576/JL/2000
Page 1 of 4
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : |
Mr. Prashant Pandey, L.C. |
|---|---|
| For respondents : |
None |
| 4. MP-FE-387/CHN/2019 (RP) FPA-FE-538/CHN/2003 |
|
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| Sh J. Shahul Hameed | … Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives | who appeared |
| For the appellant : |
Mr. Prashant Pandey, L.C. |
| For respondents : |
None |
| 5. FPA-FE-1053/CHN/2004 | |
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chenna |
i … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| Shri T. T. V. Dhinakaran | … Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives |
who appeared |
| For the Appellant no : |
Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| For respondents : |
Mr. B. Kumar, Sr. Adv.with Mr. Naveen Malhotra, Advpcate |
| 6. FPA-FE-719/DLI/2005 | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| Sh. C.K. Jain & Ors. | … Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives | who appeared |
| For the appellant : |
Mr. Prashant Pandey, L.C. |
| For respondent no. 1 : |
None |
| For respondent no. 3 : |
Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocate |
FPA-FE-198/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-158/MUM/2008, FPA-FE-142/CHN/2010, FPA-FE-538/CHN/2003, FPAFE-1053/CHN/2004, FPA-FE-719/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-154/JL/2008 & FPA-FE-576/JL/2000
Page 2 of 4
7. FPA-FE-154/JL/2008 Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandher … Appellant Versus Sh Tai Situpa & Ors. … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the appellant : Mr. Prashant Pandey, L.C. For respondents : None
8. FPA-FE-576/JL/2000 The Joint Director … Appellant Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar Versus E.D. Vs. Supreme Casting Ltd. … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Prashant Pandey, L.C. For respondents : None CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 13.02.2019
FPA-FE-198/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-158/MUM/2008, FPA-FE142/CHN/2010, FPA-FE-538/CHN/2003, FPA-FE-1053/CHN/2004, FPA-FE-719/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-154/JL/2008 & FPA-FE-576/JL/2000
The learned counsel for the appellant has read out the prayer from
the SLP which has been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court by them in the open court today where the issue of maintainability of revision
petitions has been raised.
FPA-FE-198/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-158/MUM/2008, FPA-FE-142/CHN/2010, FPA-FE-538/CHN/2003, FPAFE-1053/CHN/2004, FPA-FE-719/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-154/JL/2008 & FPA-FE-576/JL/2000
Page 3 of 4
Hon’ble Supreme Court has issued notice in the said case. In such
a situation it is not desirable that this Bench dispose off the matter without awaiting the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
These matters may be listed for hearing as and when the case is
decided by the Supreme Court, for which a suitable application will be made by either of the parties.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 13th February, 2019
‘s’
FPA-FE-198/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-158/MUM/2008, FPA-FE-142/CHN/2010, FPA-FE-538/CHN/2003, FPAFE-1053/CHN/2004, FPA-FE-719/DLI/2005, FPA-FE-154/JL/2008 & FPA-FE-576/JL/2000
Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petitions can be disposed of without awaiting the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the issue of maintainability.
Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Sh. Rajinder Singh & Ors.
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Sh. Mukund Patel & Ors.
Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Sh. Ravichandran & Ors.
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
