Disposed

FPA-FE-136/MUM/2011 of M/s. J. B. Diamonds Ltd. v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP15 Feb 2019FPA-FE-136/MUM/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Member granted an interim adjournment as a last opportunity due to the unavailability of the main arguing counsel and allowed an Official Liquidator additional time to file a status report before listing the appeals for hearing.

What did the court decide?

Granted an adjournment and additional time to the Official Liquidator; listed appeals for hearing on 21st May, 2019.

FPA-FE-136/MUM/2011 of M/s. J. B. Diamonds Ltd. v/s… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. FPA-FE-136/MUM/2011 M/s. J. B. Diamonds Ltd.	…	Appellant
2. FPA-FE-137/MUM/2011
Shri Vallabhbhai Surani	…	Appellant
3. FPA-FE-138/MUM/2011
Shri Jivrajbhai P. Surani	…	Appellant
4. FPA-FE-139/MUM/2011
Shri Bhagwanbhai K. Kukadia	…	Appellant
5. FPA-FE-140/MUM/2011
Shri Virjibhai K. Kukadia	…	Appellant
6. FPA-FE-141/MUM/2011
Shri Suresh V. Kukadia	…	Appellant
7. FPA-FE-142/MUM/2011
Shri Rajeshbhai J. Surani	…	Appellant
8. FPA-FE-143/MUM/2011
Mrs. Kalavatiben V. Surani	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the Appellant No. 1	: Mr. Sutaksh Saini, Advocate for O.L.
For the Appellant Nos. 2 to 7	: Ms. Nandita Mishra, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Ajay Kumar Chopra, Advocate
For the Respondent	: Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant
CORAM
SMT ANANYA RAY	: MEMBER

¶5

ORDER

¶6

15.02.2019

¶7

FPA-FE-137-143/MUM/2011

¶8

Proxy counsel for the appellants request for an adjournment since

¶9

the main arguing counsel is said to be unwell. They have filed an

¶10

FPA-FE-136-143/MUM/2011

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

additional Affidavit on behalf of the appellant which they state is pursuant to the order dated 05.12.2018. Learned counsel for the respondent strongly objects to the adjournment request as the adjudication order is of 2011 and till date the stay petition has not been disposed of. While agreeing to the delay, in the interest of justice, I reluctantly give an adjournment as a last opportunity.

¶13

FPA-FE-136/MUM/2011

¶14

Counsel for the appellant in appeal no. FPA-FE-136/MUM/2011 on behalf of the Official Liquidator states that he needs some more time to file status of the liquidation of the said company. He may do so within four week’s time with a copy to the respondent.

¶15

List all the appeals for hearing on stay petition on 21^st May, 2019.

¶16

(Ananya Ray) Member

¶17

New Delhi, 15^th February, 2019 ‘AS’

¶18

FPA-FE-136-143/MUM/2011

¶19

Page 2 of 2

FPA-FE-136/MUM/2011 of M/s. J. B. Diamonds Ltd. v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-FE-136/MUM/2011 of M/s. J. B. Diamonds Ltd. v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases