Single judge order granting adjournment to appellants due to the unavailability of arguing counsel who was out of the country. Matter posted for re-notification on 15th November, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-116/MUM/2011 M/s. Avantha Holdings Ltd. … Appellant FPA-FE-117/MUM/2011 Shri B. Hariharan … Appellant FPA-FE-118/MUM/2011 Shri V. K. Sablok … Appellant FPA-FE-114/MUM/2012 FPA-FE-115/MUM/2012
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Soumik Ghoshal & Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Agam Kaur, Legal Consultant CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN ORDER 10.07.2019
FPA-FE-116-118/MUM/2011 & FPA-FE-114-115/MUM/2012
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the arguing counsel is not available as he is out of country.
Request is made for adjournment is not opposed by the counsel for
the respondent.
Re-notify on 15th November, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 10th July, 2019 ‘K’
FPA-FE-116-118/MUM/2011, FPA-FE-114-115/MUM/2012
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Avantha Holdings Ltd.
Shri B. Hariharan
Shri V. K. Sablok
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Justice Manmohan Singh
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
