FPA-FE-118/MUM/2011 of Shri v. K. Sablok v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal listed appellants Avantha Holdings Ltd., B. Hariharan, and V. K. Sablok's appeals for future hearing, permitting the respondent to file a written synopsis within four weeks instead of a reply.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-FE-116/MUM/2011 | |
|---|---|
| M/s. Avantha Holdings Ltd. | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-117/MUM/2011 | |
| Shri B. Hariharan | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-118/MUM/2011 | |
| Shri V. K. Sablok | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-114/MUM/2012 | |
| FPA-FE-115/MUM/2012 |
Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Mr. Soumik Ghoshal & Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Prashant Pandey & Ms. Agam Kaur, Legal Consultants |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G. C. MISHRA |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
ORDER 17.01.2019
FPA-FE-116-118/MUM/2011, FPA-FE-114-115/MUM/2012
The counsel for the respondent states that the respondent does not wish to file the reply. Instead of this the learned counsel for the respondent wishes to file the written synopsis . Let the same be filed within four weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Avantha Holdings Ltd.
- appellant
Shri B. Hariharan
- appellant
Shri V. K. Sablok
- respondent
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court