Interim order granting the appellant two weeks to file a rejoinder to the respondent's reply filed in money laundering applications. No appeal on merits or final disposal reached.
Granted two weeks to file the rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3777/HYD/2015 (U/s 35) MP-PMLA-1839/HYD/2015 (U/s 35)
&
FPA-PMLA-987/HYD/2015
M/s Nava Bharat Project Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, … Respondent no. 1 Hyderabad
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Shri. Faraz Maqbool, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 : Sh. Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 18.01.2018
MP-PMLA-3777/HYD/2015 (U/s 35) & FPA-PMLA-987/HYD/2015
Reply of the application has been filed by the respondent. Counsel for the appellant seeks two weeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within two weeks.
List on 22nd March, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 18th January, 2018. ‘S’
FPA-PMLA-987/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s Nava Bharat Project Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
