Brief order from the Appellate Tribunal (PMLA) adjourning an appeal and directing consideration of a rejoinder by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3777/HYD/2017 (u/s 35) MP-PMLA-1839/HYD/2015 (U/s 35) &
FPA-PMLA-987/HYD/2015
M/s Nava Bharat Project Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, … Respondent no. 1 Hyderabad
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Shri Akshat Gupta, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
22.03.2018
MP-PMLA-3777/HYD/2017 (u/s 35) & FPA-PMLA-987/HYD/2015
The learned counsel for the appellant states that rejoinder of the reply filed by the respondent is ready and would be filing during the course of the
day. A copy of the same has been given to the counsel for the respondent.
List this application on 26th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 22nd March, 2018 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-987/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s Nava Bharat Project Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
