FPA-PMLA-969/CHD/2015 of Sh. Ram Dharmarth Trust v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
ATFPFPA-PMLA-969/CHD/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Sh. Ram Dharmarth Trust V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. FPA-PMLA-971/CHD/2015 S.K. Sawhney … |
Appellant/Applicant |
|---|---|
| 2. FPA-PMLA-972/CHD/2015 | |
| G.S. Sawhney … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3454/CHD/2017 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-963/CHD/2015 |
|
| Rajinder Kr. Mittal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-964/CHD/2015 | |
| Munish Kumar … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-965/CHD/2015 | |
| Vineet Goyal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 6. FPA-PMLA-966/CHD/2015 | |
| Lal Chand … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 7. FPA-PMLA-967/CHD/2015 | |
| Mukesh Mittal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 8. FPA-PMLA-968/CHD/2015 | |
| Sh. Praveen Kumar … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 9. MP-PMLA-3455/CHD/2017 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-969/CHD/2015 |
|
| Sh. Ram Dharmarth Trust … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … |
Respondents |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appe | ared |
| For the Appellant : Mr. Mr. |
H. Sawhney, Advocate Hardik Sawhney, Advocate |
| For the Respondent : Mr. |
Mohd, Faraz, Advocate |
¶3
FPA-PMLA-963 to 972/CHD/2015
¶4
Page 1 of 2
¶5
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
S.K. Sawhney et al
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Coram
AI extract
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · October
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-969/CHD/2015
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court