The Appellate Tribunal adjourned the matter to allow the appellant to engage new counsel as the respondent's representative was no longer with the Department.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3455/CHD/2017 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-969/CHD/2015
Shri Ram Dharmarth Trust (Morinda) … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S. A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 09.11.2017
FPA-PMLA-969/CHD/2015
No one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Even Mr. S. A. Saud, who was appearing on behalf of the respondent is no more counsel with the Department. Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate submits that new counsel has to be engaged for the respondent and therefore the matter should be adjourned.
In the interest of justice, re-notify on 19th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 09th November, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-969/CHD/2015
Page 1 of 1
Shri Ram Dharmarth Trust (Morinda)
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
MANMOHAN SINGH
G C MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
