Administrative order adjourning the hearing to allow respondent to file written synopsis. No substantive legal proposition or ruling is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-246/BNG/2012 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-421/BNG/2012
B.M. Ramanjinappa … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondents & Others
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Ms. Srishti Govil, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
ORDER
17.09.2018
FPA-PMLA-421/BNG/2012
The counsel for the respondent seeks some time to file the written synopsis.
Let the same be done by the next date of hearing.
List on 28th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 17th September, 2018 ‘S’
FPA-PMLA-421/BNG/2012
Page 1 of 1
B.M. Ramanjinappa
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
