The Appellate Tribunal listed the FPA-PMLA and stay petition for written submissions but did not dispose of the matter; both parties sought an adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-246/BNG/2012 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-421/BNG/2012
B.M. Ramanjinappa … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondents No. 1 to 4 & Others
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Srishti Govil, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 17.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-421/BNG/2012 & MP-PMLA-246/BNG/2012 (Stay)
Written submission has not been filed. Both the parties request for
an adjournment for the said purpose.
List on 11th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 17th February, 2017 ‘d’ FPA-PMLA-421/BNG/2012
Page 1 of 1
B.M. Ramanjinappa
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
B.K. BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
