FPA-PMLA-303/HYD/2011 of Arda Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Case brief
What is this about?
Arda Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-PMLA-297/HYD/2011 Mr. I. Janaki Rama Raju |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-PMLA-301/HYD/2011 | ||
| Smt. B. Radha | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-302/HYD/2011 | ||
| Mr. I. Mallapa Raju | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-303/HYD/2011 | ||
| Arda Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-306/HYD/2011 | ||
| B. Nandini Raju | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-307/HYD/2011 | ||
| Mitravinda Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-308/HYD/2011 | ||
| Smt. B. Jhansi Rani | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-309/HYD/2011 | ||
| Poorvabhadra Agro Farm Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. R. K. Handoo, Advocate Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Advocate Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate Ms. Shiwani Tushir, Advocate Mr. Y. Srinivas Reddy, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 13.09.2018
FPA-PMLA-297/HYD/2011, FPA-PMLA-301-303/HYD/2011 & FPAPMLA-306-309/HYD/2011
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. I. Janaki Rama Raju
- appellant
Smt. B. Radha
- appellant
Mr. I. Mallapa Raju
- appellant
Arda Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
B. Nandini Raju
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · September
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-303/HYD/2011
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court