The Tribunal framed issues and framed procedural directions for the filing of the reply and rejoinder in a fresh appeal filed under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against an order of the Adjudicating Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-2418/JP/2018
Himanshu Verma … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Aman Bahari, Advocate Shri Mohit Sharma, Advocate For the respondent : Shri A.K. Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
06.08.2018
FPA-PMLA-2418/JP/2018
The fresh appeal under section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 16th May, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority. Issue notice to the respondent. Shri A.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice. Reply be filed within six weeks with advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 7th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 6th August, 2018 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-2418/JP/2018
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Procedural directions for filing of reply and rejoinder in a fresh appeal under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Himanshu Verma
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
