The appellant and applicant filed for appeal and stay regarding proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The respondent failed to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4533/CHD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4532/CHD/2018 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2331/CHD/2018
Smt. Leela Kirpal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Advocate appeared For the respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 10.09.2018
FPA-PMLA-2331/CHD/2018 & MP-PMLA-4533/CHD/2018 (Stay)
Reply in the appeal and stay application has not been filed. One more opportunity is granted to respondent to file the replies within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinders within four weeks thereafter.
List on 14th January, 2019.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 10th September, 2018 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2331/CHD/2018
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Leela Kirpal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
MANMOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
