Partly allowed

FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 of Vimal Jadhavji Maluka @ Barot v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP18 Jul 2018FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal entertained appeals and applications to condone delay under Section 26 of the PMLA. The tribunal allowed a prayer for condonation of delay in one set of proceedings and directed exchange of records in the remaining appeals.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay allowed in one appeal; notice issued and timelines set for record exchange in others.

FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 of Vimal Jadhavji Maluka @ Barot v/s The… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-4467/MUM/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4468/MUM/2018 (COD)

¶3

¶4

FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 Vimal Jadhavji Maluka @ Barot … Appellant/Applicant

¶5

Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent &

¶6

MP-PMLA-4469/MUM/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4470/MUM/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4475/MUM/2018 (Exem.)

¶7

& FPA-PMLA-2302/MUM/2018 Smt. Kavita Deepak Duggal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent

¶8

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶9

For the Appellants : Mr. Rishi Bhuta, Advocate Mr. Saurabh Soni, Advocate Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER

¶10

ORDER 18.07.2018

¶11

MP-PMLA-4468/MUM/2018 (COD) & MP-PMLA-4470/MUM/2018 (COD)

¶12

Present appeal has been filed under Section 26 of the Prevention of

¶13

Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 15^th March, 2018.

¶14

FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2302/MUM/2018

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

Along with the appeal an application for condonation of delay of 7 days has also been filed. Issue notice in the application. We have heard both the parties. The case of the appellant is that the appellant in appeal no.FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 is in judicial custody since 2015. Therefore, certain small delay has been occurred for giving the instructions.

¶17

For the reasons stated in the application the prayer is allowed. MP is disposed of.

¶18

FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2302/MUM/2018

¶19

Issue notice. Mr. S. K. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent says that complete set of paper book has not been received. Counsel for the appellant agrees to supply the complete set of paper book within one week. Thereafter, the respondent to file the reply within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶20

Both the parties are allowed to fie the written synopsis by the next date.

¶21

List on 02^nd November, 2018.

¶22

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

(G. C. Mishra)

Member

New Delhi,

18^th April, 2018

¶27

‘AS’

¶28

FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2302/MUM/2018

¶29

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 of Vimal Jadhavji Maluka @ Barot v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-2301/MUM/2018 of Vimal Jadhavji Maluka @ Barot v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases