The Appeals Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay application filed by the appellant. The matter was listed and the appellant was directed to supply the paper-book within one week.
Condonation of delay of 8 days allowed. Paper-book to be supplied within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4337/PTN/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4457/PTN/2018 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-2222/PTN/2018
Shri Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Mridul Jain, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate Mr. A. R. Aditya, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 10.05.2018
MP-PMLA-4337/PTN/2018 (COD) & FPA-PMLA-2222/PTN/2018
The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 17th January, 2018. Along with the appeal, an application for Condonation of Delay of 8 days has been filed. For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer is allowed as no serious objection is raised on behalf of respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that the complete set of paper-book has not been supplied by the appellant. Let the same be supplied within one week.
List on 31st May, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 10th May, 2018 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-2222/PTN/2018
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal shall be allowed.
Shri Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Justices Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
