The Appellate Tribunal, in the absence of the appellant during initial hearing, noted no appearance. The appellant later appeared via counsel. No substantive order or disposition is included in the provided text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-2180/CHD/2018 Arvind Kumar Singh … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : None |
|---|
| For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER |
| ORDER |
| 06.04.2018 |
FPA-PMLA-2180/CHD/2018
No one appears on behalf of the appellant.
Re-notify on 27th April, 2018.
Copy of the order be sent to the appellant as well as his counsel by
the registry.
Later on Shri Sameer Gupta, Advocate appeared on behalf of the
appellant.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray)
Member New Delhi, 06th April, 2018 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-2180/CHD/2018
Page 1 of 1
Arvind Kumar Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
