The Appeal Tribunal noted a pending appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Notice was issued to the respondent, who appeared and accepted it. The matter was listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-2180/CHD/2018
Arvind Kumar Singh … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Advocate Appeared |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate for Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 03.08.2018
FPA-PMLA-2180/CHD/2018
Present appeal has been filed under Section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 5th January, 2018. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Let the reply be filed within four weeks.
List on 30th October, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 3rd August, 2018 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2180/CHD/2018 Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit an appeal filed under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 filed against an order dated 05.01.2018.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arvind Kumar Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
