Order clarifying that the Tribunal did not compare merits with Asaram Bapu or Ram Rahim cases, dispelling media reports, while proceeding with pending interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3864/MUM/2017 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1967/MUM/2017 Shri T.H. Mohammed Farook … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate Ms. Meenakshi Joshi |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 13.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1967/MUM/2017 & MP-PMLA-3864/MUM/2017 (COD)
Reply is on record. It is filed beyond the time granted. The same is filed only on 5th of March, 2018. The learned Counsel for the appellants seeks time to file the rejoinder. The delay in filing the reply is condoned. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 4th September, 2018.
Interim order to continue.
We may clarify here that this Tribunal on the last date never compared the merit of this case with any case pending if any of Asaram Bapu and Ram Rahim. It is incorrectly reported by the media. We are not concerned with those cases.
Copy of the order be given ‘Dasti’ to both sides.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 13th March, 2018 ‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1945/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shri T.H. Mohammed Farook
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
