Appeal against PMLA attached property order. Tribunal allowed condonation of delay petition and listed the main appeal for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3864/MUM/2017 (COD)
&
FPA-PMLA-1967/MUM/2017
Shri T.H. Mohammed Farook … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
12.10.2017
MP-PMLA-3864/MUM/2017 (COD)
For the reason stated in the application; the application for condonation of delay is allowed. The M.P. is disposed of.
FPA-PMLA-1967/MUM/2017
Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Rana accepts the notice and seeks six weeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List the appeal on 13th March, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
12th October, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1967/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shri T.H. Mohammed Farook
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
