A one-line order in an FPA under the PMLA case listing the matter for further proceedings after the appellant sought a short delay to file a rejoinder. No legal principle emanates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3849/DLI/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1955/DLI/2017
Shri Ashish Kumar … Applicant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Ms. Pritika, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 25.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1955/DLI/2017
The counsel for the appellant states that rejoinder could not be filed as the copy of the reply is received yesterday. Let the same be done by the next date. Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 18th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
25th April, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1955/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Ashish Kumar
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
