Order re-hearing FPA petitions after Member's resignation; no substantive reasoning or decision provided in this text. Judgment appears incomplete or void for tenet of substance required for indexing as ok.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3831/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3634/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1856/CHN/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Smt. V. Tamil Rajan | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-3832/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3635/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1857/CHN/2017 |
||
| Smt. K. Jeyamani | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-3636/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1858/CHN/2017 |
||
| Shri V. Kasimayan | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN ORDER 06.08.2018
FPA-PMLA-1856/CHN/2017, FPA-PMLA-1857/CHN/2017 & FPAPMLA-1858/CHN/2017
Earlier the order was reserved by the Chairman and the Hon’ble
Member. Certain clarification was sought. Hon’ble Member then
resigned. The matter has been re-heard and order reserved.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 6th August, 2018
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1856-1857-1858/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Smt. V. Tamil Rajan
Smt. K. Jeyamani
Shri V. Kasimayan
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
