Appeal against a Money Laundering Attachment Order (PMLA) filed by an appellant who claimed acquittal. The Tribunal reserved the matter and allowed two weeks to the respondent to address any pending PMLA issues.
Allow the respondent 2 weeks to mention the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3832/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3635/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1857/CHN/2017
Smt. K. Jeyamani … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
13.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1857/CHN/2017, MP-PMLA-3832/CHN/2017 (Misc.) & MPPMLA-3635/CHN/2017 (Stay)
Order reserved.
The learned Counsel for the respondent is given two weeks time to
mention the matter in case any issue is pending under PMLA as the learned Counsel for the appellant has stated that the appellant has been
acquitted in the matter.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 13th March, 2018 ‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1857/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
K. Jeyamani
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
