Single paragraph order addressing filing deadlines for the reply and rejoinder in a PMLA miscellaneous proceeding, with an interim order extending to the next date.
Reply to be filed within four weeks with advance copy; rejoinder within four weeks thereafter. Interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3603/BNG/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3605/BNG/2017 (I.R.) &
FPA-PMLA-1835/BNG/2017
Namita Samantara … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Korla Harshavardhan, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Mohd. Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 22.02.2018
FPA-PMLA-1835/BNG/2017
Reply has not been filed. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks more time to file the same. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 11th July, 2018.
Interim order to continue till the next date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 22nd February, 2018. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1835/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the reply inquiry report should be filed within the stipulated time.
Namita Samantara
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
