This order grants the respondent time to reply to an appeal and continues an interim order passed in April 2017.
Reply by respondent to be filed within four weeks; interim order of 13 April 2017 continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3603/BNG/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3604/BNG/2017 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-3605/BNG/2017 (I.R.) &
FPA-PMLA-1835/BNG/2017
Namita Samantara … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Korla Harshavardhan, Advocate Mr. Zahid Laiq Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Mohd. Faraz, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
20.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1835/BNG/2017
Reply to the appeal and interim application has not been filed. Learned Counsel for the respondent seeks some more time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 22nd February, 2018.
Interim Order passed on 13th April, 2017 shall continue till the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
20th September, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1835/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
Namita Samantara
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
