The Appellate Tribunal listed the matter for remaining arguments on behalf of the respondent to be heard on 9th April, 2018. The respondent filed a reply subsequently.
This order records the procedural listing of remaining arguments for the respondent in Appeal No. MP-PMLA-3236. No substantive judicial decision is rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3236/MUM/2017 (STAY) & FPA-PMLA-1681/MUM/2017
Sh. Vivek Mathias
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate Shri Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Ms. Meena Venugopal, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 19.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1681/MUM/2017
Mr. Rajiv Nair, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant has concluded his arguments. Mr. Awasthi, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent referred certain para of the replies. The same is no available on record. He states that he will check up the same in the registry and see that the same is placed on record. He further states that in case the reply is not traceable in the registry he would be filing the photo copies of the same within one week with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant.
List for remaining arguments on behalf of the respondent on 9th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 19th March, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1681/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
Sh. Vivek Mathias
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
