This order records that the respondent's counsel noted a wrong date and the file is yet to be carried. Arguments are to be continued on 19th March, 2018.
In this listing order, the Tribunal noted that the respondent counsel had not carried the file due to a note of a wrong date. The appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority in CBI case No. FPA-PMLA-1681/MUM/2017 was adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3236/MUM/2017 (STAY)
&
FPA-PMLA-1681/MUM/2017
SH. Vivek Mathias … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : |
Sh. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate Shri Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Shri Manish Jha, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : |
Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI ANAND KISHORE |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| ORDER 13.02.201 |
8 |
FPA-PMLA-1681/MUM/2017
Mr. Rajiv Nayar has argued the matter for some time. Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, counsel for the respondent submits that he has not carried the file as he has noted wrong date.
List for remaining arguments on 19th March, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 13th February, 2018. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1681/MUM/2017 Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sh. Vivek Mathias
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
