The tribunal issued a procedural order fixing a deadline for the respondent to file replies to the main appeal and stay applications, requiring advance copies, and listed the matter for the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3176/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3177/HYD/2017 (A.D.) &
FPA-PMLA-1655/HYD/2017
Jugal Kishore Agarwal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri P. Prasad, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Adv. For Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
15.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1655/HYD/2017, MP-PMLA-3176/HYD/2017 (A.D.) & MPPMLA-3177/HYD/2017 (Stay)
Reply in the main appeal has been filed by the respondent. The counsel for the respondent also seeks time to file the reply in the stay application as well as application of additional documents. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 1st August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 15th March, 2018. ‘s’ FPA-PMLA-1655/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
Jugal Kishore Agarwal
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
