An order by the Appellate Tribunal giving the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply while listing the matter for future hearing. No substantive decision or disposition is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3176/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3177/HYD/2017 (A.D.) &
FPA-PMLA-1655/HYD/2017
Jugal Kishore Agarwal … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri P. Prasad, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
08.05.2017
MP-PMLA-3176/HYD/2017 (Stay), MP-PMLA-3177/HYD/2017 (A.D.) & FPA-PMLA-1655/HYD/2017
Reply has not been filed till date. One final opportunity is given to the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned Counsel for the Appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List the matter on 20th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 8th May, 2017 M
FPA-PMLA-1655/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
Jugal Kishore Agarwal
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
