The Appellate Tribunal allowed time for the appellant to file a rejoinder and fixed the list date for FPA-PMLA-1644 & 1646-1648/CHN/2017. No substantive issue was resolved in this routing order.
Time allowed for filing rejoinder. Order reviewed/listed on 01.08.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1644/CHN/2017 G. Ranuka … Appellant/Applicant FPA-PMLA-1646/CHN/2017 M. Hema … Appellant/Applicant FPA-PMLA-1647/CHN/2017 S. Gauthaman … Appellant/Applicant FPA-PMLA-1648/CHN/2017 S. Mahendran … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Prasad Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 22.02.2018
FPA-PMLA-1644 & 1646-1648/CHN/2017
Reply has been filed. The counsel for the appellant seeks some
time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be done by the next date.
List on 1st August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 22nd February, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1644 & 1646-1648/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
G. Ranuka
M. Hema
S. Gauthaman
S. Mahendran
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
