On an application for condonation of delay in a fresh appeal filed by G. Ranuka under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, where the appellant did not appear, the Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and listed the matter on 17.04.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3302/CHN/2017 (COD)
FPA-PMLA-1644/CHN/2017
G. Ranuka … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 29.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1644/CHN/2017
The fresh appeal has been filed by the appellant impugning the order dated 4th August, 2016. No one appears on behalf of the appellant.
Along with the appeal, the appellant has also filed the application for condonation of delay of 122 days in filing the appeal. The appeal has been received by post. Let the notice be issued to the application for condonation of delay. Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate accepts the notice on behalf of the respondent. He says that he will take direction on behalf of the department to appear in the matter. Let the reply be filed within four weeks.
List the appeal as well as the application on 17th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 29th March, 2017. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1644/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed without appearance and with delay requires condonation and listing?
Whether directions should be issued to the respondent for appearance?
G. Ranuka
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
