The Appellate Tribunal granted the respondent six weeks to file a reply to the stay appeals, with an advance copy to the appellants' counsel. The matter was listed for further hearing on 28th August, 2018.
Six weeks granted to respondent to file reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3127/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1633/MUM/2017 Dr. Vijay Mallya … Appellant/Applicant MP-PMLA-3766/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3767/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1634/MUM/2017 United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant MP-PMLA-3129/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1636/MUM/2017 M/s. P.E. Data Centre … Appellant/Applicant MP-PMLA-3132/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1637/MUM/2017 M/s. Endeavour Estates Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Himanshu, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Prashant Pandey, L.C. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 17.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1633, 1634, 1636 & 1637 /MUM/2017
Reply to the appeal has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the same within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 28th August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 17th April, 2018. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1633, 1634, 1636, 1637/MUM/2017 Page 1 of 1
Dr. Vijay Mallya
United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd.
M/s. P.E. Data Centre
M/s. Endeavour Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
