The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional six-week opportunity to file a reply without prejudice to their right to file an advance copy to the appellant, who may then file a rejoinder if necessary. The matter was listed for April 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3129/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1636/MUM/2017
M/s P.E. Data Centre … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Nakul Mohta, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 15.11.2017
FPA-PMLA-1636/MUM/2017
Reply has not been filed. One more opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the same within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 17th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 15th November, 2017 ‘K’ FPA-PMLA-1636/MUM/2017 Page 1 of 1
M/s P.E. Data Centre
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
