The Tribunal directed parties in multiple stays and framing of charges appeals to file valuation reports for properties and market rent within two months, deferred due to floods, with an option to file rejoinders subsequently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) MP-PMLA-3293/COCHIN/2018 (A.G.) MP-PMLA-3297/COCHIN/2017 (MISC.) MP-PMLA-2966/COCHIN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1567/COCHIN/2016 Khadeeja … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin … Respondent (2) MP-PMLA-2968/COCHIN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1568/COCHIN/2016 Hydrose N … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri K.N. Jayasankar, Advocate Shri Ms. Beena Nair, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| Shri Jithin Saji Isaac, Advocate | ||
| For the Respondent | : | Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
| (3) MP-PMLA-2972/COCHIN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1572/COCHIN/2016 |
|
|---|---|
| Hassan A.A. |
… Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Naveen Malhotra, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
FPA-PMLA-1567-1568/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1572/COCHIN/2016 FPA-PMLA-1580/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1599, 1600 & 1601/COCHIN/2017 FPA-PMLA-1609, 1610 , 1611 & 1612/COCHIN/2017
Page 1 of 4
| (4) MP-PMLA-2984/COCHIN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1580/COCHIN/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Sabira M. |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who | appe | ared |
| For the appellant : | Shri | Susheel Cyriac, Advocate |
| For the Respondent : |
Shri | S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
| (5) MP-PMLA-3056/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1599/COCHIN/2017 |
||
| Hameed Pandarathil |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
| (6) MP-PMLA-3058/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1600/COCHIN/2017 |
||
| Smt. Laila Siddique |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
| (7) MP-PMLA-3060/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1601/COCHIN/2017 |
||
| Sulaikha |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
| (8) MP-PMLA-3071/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1609/COCHIN/2017 |
||
| Ummer Pandarathil |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-1567-1568/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1572/COCHIN/2016 FPA-PMLA-1580/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1599, 1600 & 1601/COCHIN/2017 FPA-PMLA-1609, 1610 , 1611 & 1612/COCHIN/2017 |
Page 2 of 4 |
| (9) MP-PMLA-3073/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1610/COCHIN/2017 |
|
|---|---|
| Abdulla Pandarathil |
… Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… Respondent |
| (10) MP-PMLA-3075/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1611/COCHIN/2017 |
|
| Shri Ashraf C.V. |
… Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… Respondent |
| (11) MP-PMLA-3077/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1612/COCHIN/2017 |
|
| Amina Panadarathil |
… Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Jaiveer Shergill, Advocate Shri Gaurav Gupta, Advocate Shri Suresh Chandran, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 17.09.2018
FPA-PMLA-1567-1568/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1572/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1580/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1599, 1600 & 1601/COCHIN/2017, FPA-PMLA-1609, 1610, 1611 & 1612/COCHIN/2017
The Tribunal had directed the respondents to file valuation report in
each of the properties in the above said listed appeals. It is seen that in
FPA-PMLA-1567-1568/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1572/COCHIN/2016 FPA-PMLA-1580/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1599, 1600 & 1601/COCHIN/2017 FPA-PMLA-1609, 1610 , 1611 & 1612/COCHIN/2017
Page 3 of 4
a couple of properties some valuation report has been filed, while in others it is not there. The learned counsel for the appellant stated they would also like to submit valuation reports and that because of the floods in Kerala they are not able to immediately get the valuation reports. The counsel for the respondent seeks some time to get rest of the reports.
It is seen apart from the agricultural land there are residential/commercial properties also for which the market rent needs to be ascertained. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to file the valuation report for the agricultural land and market rent for the residential/commercial properties within two months with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant. In case, the appellant desires to file the rejoinder they may do so within a further period of one month. Whatever documents are in local language, the appellant and the respondent, whoever files it are also to file the translated copies.
List on 13th December, 2018.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 17th September, 2018
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1567-1568/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1572/COCHIN/2016 FPA-PMLA-1580/COCHIN/2016, FPA-PMLA-1599, 1600 & 1601/COCHIN/2017 FPA-PMLA-1609, 1610 , 1611 & 1612/COCHIN/2017
Page 4 of 4
Khadeeja
Hydrose N
Hassan A.A.
Sabira M.
Hameed Pandarathil
Laila Siddique
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
