Appears against the direction to list 17 Prevention of Money-Laundering Act first appeals before the Appellate Tribunal, as the Chairman was unavailable at an outstation location due to IPAB matters. The matter was listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-PMLA-1529/COCHIN/2016 Santiagu Martin |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-PMLA-1533/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Sh. Jose Daison | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1534/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Sh. S. Ravi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Daison Land and Development Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1536/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Charles Realators Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1537/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Diason Luzury Villas Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1538/COCHIN/2016 Martin Multi Projects Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Himanshu, Advocate Ms. Radhika, Advocate Mr. Manan, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 09.08.2018
FPA-PMLA-1529-1538/COCHIN/2016
Bench has not assembled today as the Hon’ble Chairman is busy
in IPAB matters at Outstation.
List on 21st February, 2019.
(Ved Prakash) Registrar
New Delhi, 9th August, 2018 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1529-1538/COCHIN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Santiagu Martin, Jose Daison, S. Ravi, Daison Land and Development Pvt. Ltd., Charles Realators Pvt. Ltd., Diason Luzury Villas Pvt. Ltd., Martin Multi Projects
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
