Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016 of Daison Land Development P. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin

ATFP20 Dec 2016FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order in an appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Tribunal allowed time for the respondent to file a reply following the notice under Section 26 and permitted parties to file written synopses.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued to respondent; time granted for reply; permission to file synopsis allowed; matter listed for hearing.

FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016 of Daison Land Development P. Ltd. v/s… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2016)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016

¶3

Daison Land Development P. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus

¶4

The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin … Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellant	: Shri Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate With Shri Rishi Agarwal, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	: MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	: MEMBER

¶7

ORDER 20.12.2016

¶8

FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016

¶9

Learned counsel for the appellant states that respondent no.2. may be deleted in the appeal. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks.

¶10

Appellant has filed the appeal under section 26 of the PMA Act - 2002 against the order dated 22^nd September, 2016. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. N.K. Matta, Advocate accepts the notice on behalf of the respondent and seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶11

Both the parties are allowed to file their written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.

¶12

The learned counsel for the appellant states that the matter is also pending before the Hon’ble Kerala High Court and in the light of the order

¶13

FPA-PMLA-1535/Cochin/2016

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

dated 4^th August, 2016 therein he is not pressing for the interim order at this stage in the matter.

¶16

List on 11^th April, 2017.

¶17

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶18

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

(Anand Kishore)

Member

New Delhi,

20^th December, 2016

¶23

‘s’

¶24

FPA-PMLA-1535/Cochin/2016

¶25

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016 of Daison Land Development P. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016 of Daison Land Development P. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases