The Adjudicating Officer decided not to modify the identification of the respondent based on correspondence dated 06 July 2018 in a petition under Sections 5 and 5O of the PMLA.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2811/IDR/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1488/IDR/2016 Dr. Manjushree Bhandari … Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate for Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SMT. ANANYA RAY |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
| ORDER 19.01.2018 |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1488/IDR/2016 |
Re-notify on 06th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman (Ananya Ray) Member New Delhi, 19th January, 2018 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1488/IDR/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for modification of identification of respondent needs to be allowed given the re-notification.
Dr. Manjushree Bhandari
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
