Listing order in FPA-PMLA appeals where no appellant representative appeared. Parties were allowed to file written synopses for future consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1472/BNG/2016 Shri M. Ramachandra & Ors. … Appellants/Applicant FPA-PMLA-1473/BNG/2016 Smt. R. Yureka … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 12.09.2018
FPA-PMLA-1472-1473/BNG/2016
Reply has been filed. No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Rejoinder has not been filed by the appellant. Right to file the rejoinder is closed. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 30th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 12th September, 2018
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1472-1473/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
Shri M. Ramachandra & Ors.
Smt. R. Yureka
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Justice Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
