The Appellate Tribunal allowed time for filing a reply and reversed the stay application discharge by extending the period for filing. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
extension of time for filing reply
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2782/BNG/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1472/BNG/2016 Shri M. Ramachandra & Ors. … Appellants/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Umakant Mishra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
17.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1472/BNG/2016 & MP-PMLA-2782/BNG/2016 (Stay)
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is allowed to file the
same within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the
appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 21st April, 2017.
Interim order to continue till further order.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 17th February, 2017 ‘d’ FPA-PMLA-1472/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
Shri M. Ramachandra & Ors.
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
