The Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, directed both parties to file written synopses within two weeks and fixed the hearing for 14 August 2018. No substantive adjudication was made. This is a procedural order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-2655/DLI/2016 FPA-PMLA-1417/DLI/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Sh. H. B. Chaturvedi | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2656/DLI/2016 |
||
| FPA-PMLA-1418/DLI/2016 | ||
| Neelima Chaturvedi | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2657/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1419/DLI/2016 | ||
| Amit Chaturvedi | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2658/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1420/DLI/2016 | ||
| Anju Chatervedi | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2659/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1421/DLI/2016 | ||
| M/s. Shamken International Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2660/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1422/DLI/2016 | ||
| Sanjay Chaturvedi | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … | Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Represe | ntatives who appeared |
|---|---|
| For the Appellants | : Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate |
| For the Respondent | : Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER
04.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016
Both the parties seek two weeks time to file the written synopsis. Let
the same be filed within two weeks.
FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016 Page 1 of 2
List on 14th August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 04th July, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
H. B. Chaturvedi
Neelima Chaturvedi
Amit Chaturvedi
Anju Chaturvedi
Shamken International Ltd.
Sanjay Chaturvedi
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
