Listed appeal for final argument; granted four weeks to appellant for rejoinder; directed parties to file written synopsis on next date; reply from respondent not yet on record.
Four weeks extension granted to appellant for filing rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2660/DLI/2016 FPA-PMLA-1422/DLI/2016
Sanjay Chaturvedi … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Shaijan C. George, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 22.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1422/DLI/2016
Reply is not on record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that the same has been filed. He will take up with the registry and see that the same is placed on record by the next date. In the meanwhile, four weeks time is granted to the appellant to file the rejoinder. Both the parties will file the written synopsis on or before the next date.
List the appeal for final argument on 05th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 22nd February, 2017 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1422/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Sanjay Chaturvedi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
